A fish and chip shop/restaurant owner who allegedly breached a "Frying Range Warranty" has won the first round of its legal battle with its insurer in relation to a fire claim.  The owner of the building also won the preliminary skirmish.

The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd & Ors v Aviva Insurance Limited and Ors [2011] EWHC 1761 is a recent UK House of Lords decision (1 November 2011).  In that case the Commercial Court considered, as preliminary points, the construction and scope of a breach of warranty clause and two non-invalidation clauses.  The claimants won each point.  The decision is of relevance to legal and/or industry practitioners in Hong Kong and other common law based jurisdictions in the Asia-Pacific.  However, in Australia, the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 put the issues raised in this matter beyond dispute long ago.

 You can read the full update here.

This information is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.

Posted by Ann Leung on Friday 09 Dec 2011
Comments:

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed